The source for
exclusive news on
securities regulation

05:23 AM, Mar. 21, 2010
DOWNLOAD CURRENT ISSUE (PDF)
CORPORATE ACCESS
CONTACT US
SUBSCRIBE NOW
FREE TRIAL
Skip Navigation Links
NEWS
Home
Top Stories
Brokerage
Investment Management
Europe & Asia
Corporate
FEATURES
Regulatory Alert
Bar Stool
Special FeaturesExpand Special Features
Awards
Regulatory Talk
Conference Reports
Scroll up
Scroll down
RESOURCES
Archives
Links
Corporate Access
Buyer's GuidesExpand Buyer's Guides
Rising StarsExpand Rising Stars
Events
Securities Technology Product & Services Online Guide
Hedge Fund Service Provider Guide
Pension Fund Service Provider Guide
Structured Finance Service Provider Guide
Scroll up
Scroll down
20 Rising Stars of Mutual Funds - 2008
The 20 Rising Stars of Compliance - 2007
The 20 Rising Stars of Retirement Plan Advisors - 2007
The 20 Rising Stars of Wealth Management
The 20 Rising Stars of Hedge Funds
The 20 Rising Stars of Real Estate
The 20 Rising Stars of Fixed Income
Scroll up
Scroll down

Skip Navigation Links
MY ACCOUNT
Login
Update Login Information
Update Account Information
Renew Subscription
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Agents
About Compliance Reporter
Contact Us
Help/FAQ's
ADVERTISING
Advertising Opportunities
SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe
Free Trial

ABA Calls For Loss Accounting Delay

- 09/26/2008    To comment on this article click here (0)

The American Bar Association has called on the Financial Accounting Standards Board to put back the implementation date for proposals that would beef up disclosures on loss contingencies. ABA President Thomas Wells wrote to the FASB Sept. 18, asking that the Board delay bringing Statement 141(R) into effect past Dec. 15. FASB in June proposed changing both Statement 141(R) and Statement No. 5 to expand reporting on loss contingencies.

The ABA last month in a separate letter urged the Board not to adopt proposed changes to Statement 5, arguing that they would undermine attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine during the audit process. The ABA said in its latest letter that many of the concerns it raised in regard to Statement 5 also apply to loss contingency provisions of Statement 141(R). The revised Statement 141(R), which will require disclosure of loss contingencies taken on as part of mergers and other business combinations, should not go into effect while these issues are being evaluated, Wells wrote. A spokesman for FASB did not return a call.



YOU ARE ENTITLED TO DISPLAY AND SEARCH THE CONTENT OF THIS SERVICE AT THE TERMINAL ACCESSING OUR SITE, AND TO DOWNLOAD ARTICLES, SOLELY FOR YOUR OWN PERSONAL USAGE. NO PART OF THIS SERVICE OR CONTENT CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE OTHERWISE RETRANSMITTED, REDISTRIBUTED, COPIED, STORED, DOWNLOADED, ABSTRACTED, DISSEMINATED, CIRCULATED OR INCLUDED AS PART OF ANY OTHER PRODUCT OR SERVICE.

Compliance Reporter | DOWNLOAD CURRENT ISSUE (PDF) | Corporate Access | Contact Us | Subscribe | Free Trial | Sitemap
© 2008 Institutional Investor | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy